Origin > Living Forever > Foreword to Electronic Reporting in the Digital Medical Enterprise
Permanent link to this article: http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0582.html

Printable Version
    Foreword to Electronic Reporting in the Digital Medical Enterprise
by   Ray Kurzweil

Doctors in the year 2012 will have access to full-immersion virtual-reality training and surgical systems, microchip-based protein and gene analysis systems, knowledge-based systems providing automated guidance and access to the most recent medical research, and always-present visual displays of patient data for instant interaction via voice.


Published in KurzweilAI.net November 1, 2002

Foreword

Ray Kurzweil, one of the foremost pioneers in the field of artificial intelligence, has been called “the ultimate thinking machine” by Forbes magazine. As early as 1974, he led the development of the first “omni-font” optical character recognition (OCR) technology, which made it possible for computers to recognize printed and typed documents. In 1976, he adapted this technology for use in the Kurzweil Reading Machine, which reads documents aloud to the blind and visually impaired. His OCR technology also provided the capability for Lexus and Nexus to build their online legal and news information services. He also developed the first commercially marketed large-vocabulary speech recognition devices.

In 1999, Kurzweil received the National Medal of Technology, the nation’s highest honor in technology, from President Clinton in a White House ceremony. He has received hundreds of other national and international awards and is the author of The Age of Intelligent Machines (1990) and The Age of Spiritual Machines, When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence (1999).

This speech recognition pioneer shared his thoughts on the future of computers in medicine with the editors and readers of this SCAR Primer.

The last time I brought my car in for a check-up, the dealer had a comprehensive history of all of its repairs and tests up on his screen as I pulled in. The last time I brought my body in for a check-up, my doctor had a thick folder of dog-eared paper records on his desk. If we wanted to plot one of my health variables&#8212cholesterol, say—this would require a time-consuming project of thumbing through many disparate records in varied formats, assuming the data could be found at all.

Medicine is perhaps the most knowledge-intensive profession one can pursue, so it may seem surprising that we are not further along in the use of computation, which is the most powerful technology we have for containing and controlling knowledge. The reasons for this state of affairs are many: medical knowledge is extremely complex and, therefore, difficult to represent in rigid tabular databases, and there are no clear authorities to set and enforce standards for electronic medical records.

But this is now starting to change rapidly. Because of its complexity, medicine has been slower than some other fields to fully embrace the computer. By the end of the decade, however, I believe we will find medicine as the profession taking best advantage of knowledge-based technology. There are many factors for this impending transformation: the Internet, the ubiquity of inexpensive computers, the advent of portable computing, and a broad array of advances in computerized systems that affect all phases of medicine.

The Internet is already a powerful force changing the relationship between doctors and patients. Patients are increasingly knowledgeable about medical issues as a result of the thousands of medical Web sites and discussion groups, although the reliability of much of the information is a legitimate concern. Increasingly, patients come into their visits armed with information that they want to review. Although dealing with misinformation is an issue, most doctors I’ve talked to find that increased patient knowledge results in greater compliance with treatment and lifestyle recommendations, because the patients have a greater understanding of the implications of their condition. Many doctors are using the Web and e-mail as means of communicating with their patients. Although these new modalities of communication can be very effective, they can also create new dilemmas (e.g., how should a doctor handle the potential for an e-mail being sent by a patient complaining of chest pain at 3 a.m.?)

We are in the early stages of many other salient trends. Telemedicine is used as doctors share imaging data over the Internet and engage in videoconferencing to access expertise in other geographical areas. Automated pattern recognition is starting to be used in identifying areas of interest in electrocardiograms (particularly the lengthy 24-hour Holter tapes) and blood cell analyses. Databases that provide information on drug interactions are coming into general use. The human genome project has revealed the basic genetic data needed to launch an almost limitless number of inquiries and practical applications. Microchip technology is being used to analyze biological samples for specific proteins and strands of DNA. Viable electronic medical records are emerging. Virtual reality systems, which include haptic (i.e., tactile) interfaces are used in training surgeons and even in certain types of surgery.

Let’s consider how these trends will manifest themselves over the next decade: it is now the year 2012.

Computers have essentially disappeared and are no longer contained in little rectangular boxes. Personal computers have become, well, very personal. The computer “display” is now built into the user’s eyeglasses and contact lenses, which paint images directly onto the retina. Similarly discreet devices provide two-way auditory communication. We are plugged into the Web at all times through very high bandwidth wireless connections. And all of the electronics required are built into our eyeglasses and woven into our clothing.

Virtual displays (created by the “direct eye” displays) hover in the air (and can be seen through) as we walk around. Alternatively, these display lenses allow users to enter full-immersion virtual reality environments, where they can interact with other people: patients, other doctors involved in a case, and remote medical experts, none of whom need to be physically proximate. Specialized haptic devices even allow physical examinations from afar. It’s now possible for medical technicians with relatively inexpensive equipment to bring health care to remote areas.

Doctors routinely train in virtual reality environments that simulate the visual, auditory, and tactile experience of medical procedures, including surgery. The virtual environments allow interacting with physically remote patients, but simulated patients are also available. With a simulated patient, a medical student (or a physician taking a continuing medical education course, or even a high school student learning what it’s like to be a doctor) can engage in a complete simulated doctor–patient encounter, diagnose a condition, and recommend a treatment. He or she can then fast forward to the next encounter with that patient (which can be a few—simulated—hours or months later) and see how things turned out.

Microchip-based protein and gene analysis systems allow thousands of tests to be rapidly administered in a doctor’s office as well as at home. Computer-based pattern recognition is routinely used to interpret imaging data and blood cell analysis. The resolution and bandwidth of noninvasive imaging technologies have greatly improved and are used ubiquitously, with diagnosis involving a collaboration between the human physician and a pattern-recognition–based expert system.

Lifetime patient records are maintained in computer databases, and trend analyses for critical medical variables (e.g., blood pressure, hormone levels) are readily available. Privacy concerns about access to these records (as with many other databases of personal information) continue to be a major issue.

Doctors routinely consult knowledge-based systems, which provide automated guidance, access to the most recent medical research, and practice guidelines. Practice guidelines are implemented as expert systems that provide automated suggestions and not just as written documents.

As a doctor examines a patient (who may be hundreds or thousands of miles away), he or she views well-organized displays of relevant information on always present visual displays. All of the currently relevant examination and test data are displayed (and seen hovering in the air), as are all relevant trends. The doctor interacts with this invisible computer either by speaking to it or by manipulating a special handheld device. In addition to patient data, the doctor can see tentative diagnoses and treatment recommendations from the automated diagnostic and practice guideline systems. If the doctor wants to share certain information with the patient (e.g., “look at how your blood pressure has improved over the past week”), a relevant graph or other display can be sent to the patient’s own computerized display. Commands to the computerized systems to accomplish these tasks can be given in natural language voice commands (e.g., “send blood pressure graph to Sally”), or, when the doctor wants to communicate with his or her own computer display discreetly, a handheld communicator could be used.

The bioengineering revolution, which was only coming into its own in 2002, is now in full swing. The toll from the major killers of 2002—heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes—have been greatly reduced, and these diseases are becoming manageable chronic conditions. Anti-aging treatments are becoming available, and bioengineering now appears to be extending the human life span by more than a year every year.

Surgery now typically uses a virtual reality system that allows the surgeon to view a site of surgery that is inside the patient from outside the patient. The virtual reality system can also greatly increase the apparent size of the surgery site. For example, tiny nerves and blood vessels can be made to appear tens or even hundreds of times larger, so that the surgeon can use large physical movements to control very small precise movements of robotic manipulators that are in contact with the patient’s tissues.

Neural implants for sensory disorders (e.g., improved cochlear, auditory cortex, and retinal implants) are widely used, as are neural implants for certain neurological diseases such as Parkinson’s disease and a variety of tremor-causing conditions. Using the robotic virtual reality surgical systems, these implants can be introduced using minimally invasive procedures.

Patients who share medical conditions and concerns frequently meet with each other in virtual reality meetings. Patients are increasingly knowledgeable about their own health conditions. There has been a great deal of consolidation of health-related Web sites, and authoritative sites that have the confidence of both doctors and patients have emerged. This allows patients to take increasing responsibility for their own health and lifestyle choices and allows physicians to take the role of knowledgeable guides to an increasingly complex world of medical technology.

@ 2002 Ray Kurzweil.

   
 

   [Post New Comment]
   
Mind·X Discussion About This Article:

Kurzweil Radiology Article
posted on 06/09/2003 2:09 PM by boatman

[Top]
[Mind·X]
[Reply to this post]

It seems fantastic that if you can live another 10 years and wind up in reasonable health at that time, life expectancy will increase faster than you can age. Using the law of accerating returns, a person who is in good health at age 70, ten years from now, could theoretically live indefinately. This assumes, of course, that said person has the resources and desire to continually update one's aging biological organism with the appropriate technology as it becomes available.

I think this is entirely possible. However, the element of risk still remains for all of us. Among other things, medical doctors are human and frequently make mistakes. In addition, some of the technology which appears promising initially, may prove fatal.

However, I remain optimistic for those of us who stay informed and up to date. Especially those who take the time to understand the risk/reward ratio of any new technology and act with the knowledge that Doctors offices and Hospitals are dangerous places.

Re: Kurzweil Radiology Article
posted on 06/09/2003 5:11 PM by Ribald

[Top]
[Mind·X]
[Reply to this post]

I think it is sad to raise the hopes of the aging populace in this fashion.

Re: Kurzweil Radiology Article
posted on 06/10/2003 12:32 AM by boatman

[Top]
[Mind·X]
[Reply to this post]

The aging population's hopes are no more being raised by Kurzweil than by the Cancer Society which continues to chronicle the advances recently made in living with or curing various cancers (lukemia). Any sane person knows that when your number is up, you're dead. The worst that can happen is that the older generation might take better care of themselves on the off chance that they could get an artifical heart, a new kidney etc. by the time they might need it.

It makes me sad to see so many younger people who are pessimist about the biotechnical future.

Re: Kurzweil Radiology Article
posted on 06/10/2003 1:44 AM by Ribald

[Top]
[Mind·X]
[Reply to this post]

The difference is that the Cancer Society doesn't say things like: "Using the law of accerating returns, a person who is in good health at age 70, ten years from now, could theoretically live indefinately".

I mean please, it takes 7 years for a new hemmorhoid cream to make it to market. Medical science has barely scratched the surface of understanding, asserting that we are 10 years from immortality is outrageous.

At least you aren't saying it is only a couple of months away, I suppose.

Re: Kurzweil Radiology Article
posted on 06/10/2003 2:16 AM by boatman

[Top]
[Mind·X]
[Reply to this post]

You make a good point with regard to the FDA. This would also apply to the AMA and the various state medical licensing authorities. However, England, Denmark and Mexico don't have these onerous restrictions. I'm sure that if the innovations are available and you have the money, new biotech will be for sale.

I didn't mean to imply that immortality was a given in 10 years based upon Kurzweil's theories. I am of the opinion that the quality of my life has already been enhanced by the internet and the opportunity to exchange ideas with people like you. It has also allowed for the rapid exchange of ideas throughout the world-which will certainly speed things up with regard to technological advances.

Reasonable minds can differ, and your points are well taken.

I'll bet we can both agree that humans and machines will continue to merge and that the end result will be an enhanced human (my dad really likes his artificial hip).

What we can't agree on is how long it will be before meaningful life extension can be achieved.

If it doesn't happen within the next 30 years, I'll eat your shirt with no fear of indigestion(my life expectancy will have expired).

Re: Kurzweil Radiology Article
posted on 06/10/2003 2:44 PM by Ribald

[Top]
[Mind·X]
[Reply to this post]

Reasonable minds can differ, and your points are well taken.

I'll bet we can both agree that humans and machines will continue to merge and that the end result will be an enhanced human (my dad really likes his artificial hip).

What we can't agree on is how long it will be before meaningful life extension can be achieved.

If it doesn't happen within the next 30 years, I'll eat your shirt with no fear of indigestion(my life expectancy will have expired).


I concur, our disagreement is more one of rate of change than substance of belief. And for the record, I would RATHER that you were correct in that regard. Otherwise you will be excavating to find my shirt...

Re: Kurzweil Radiology Article
posted on 09/06/2003 2:45 PM by 80'sRich

[Top]
[Mind·X]
[Reply to this post]

At only 19 I can't realy assess the kind of changes that can go on in the space of 10 to thirty years, though seeing my commodore 64 turn into a pc has been pretty impressive. One thing I do remember though is when automation first began in the workplace and began taking over peoples jobs people tomorrows world began running stories about how machines will be doing everything for us by the 1990's and we wont know what to do with all our freetime. Yet people now do more work than ever before.

Predicting the future is almost impossible, we could all be wiped out in ten minutes since nuclear weapons became so abundant. The theory behind nanomedicine and other futuretechnologies seem sound, but putting theory to practice has often ruined many dreams. i wont get my hopes up till its here and working.

Re: Kurzweil Radiology Article
posted on 12/19/2005 2:17 PM by trait70426

[Top]
[Mind·X]
[Reply to this post]

i like to liken it to economics.
economics attempts to model impossibly complex things.
looking into the singularity is similar.
its like asking an insect to evaluate the stock exchange.
it is asking mere humans to peer into an opacity.
you can sort of feel for it, but you wont get too far.
there are many interesting suspicions.
early Sing eventuations probably contain biological plasticization.
and then deliberate lifeform design.
i look forward to golden dragons.
and pteradactyls.
and possibly chimaeras.
griffons for sure.
possibly medusas.
certainly poseidons.
hopefully monsters.

Re: Kurzweil Radiology Article
posted on 12/20/2005 8:40 AM by Extropia

[Top]
[Mind·X]
[Reply to this post]

If you drive a car and observe all the rules of the highway, stick to the speed limit, never overtake unless you are certain it is safe to do so, keep a suitable distance between you and the driver in front and so on..by the immutable Sod's Law you will still very likely have an accident. But I still say it's worth driving as if you are responsible for your safety.

Similarly, while I fully expect to keel over and die, I still say it's worthwhile treating your body and mind as if infirmity were the results of lifestyle choices, rather than the inevitabilities of passing time. A fatalistic attitude of 'since I have to die I might as well enjoy another cream donut' ignores the vastly improved sense of wellbeing that you achieve when you work WITH your body, rather than against it.

Perhaps it is too much to hope that the radical life expectancies projected by the likes of Kurzweil come to pass for my generation. But I don't think it's too much to ask that, by the time I am 80, I will be like Chuck Yeager (who is still able to fly supersonic jet fighters) rather than my grandfather (who sits in a chair all day insisting he is 'not long for this world'- a claim he has been making for the past decade).

'It is one of the most remarkable things in all of the biological sciences that there is no clue as to the necessity of death. If you say we want to make perpetual motion, we have discovered enough laws as we studied physics to see that it is either absolutely impossible or else the laws are wrong. But there is nothing in biology yet found that indicated the inevitability of death. This suggests to me that it is not at all inevitable'- R. Feynman.

Re: Kurzweil Radiology Article
posted on 12/20/2005 8:47 AM by Extropia

[Top]
[Mind·X]
[Reply to this post]

Err, what I'm trying to say is, what's so wrong with acting as if YOU are responsible for whether you grow old and die, even if the reality is that golden era won't arrive in time to save you?

One problem with this idea is conflicting information. How many times have you read that 'something you thought was bad has now been found to be good' and vice versa? Vitamins for example. According to 'Fantastic Voyage' we could all do with megadoses of vitamins and minerals, but other sources say megadoses of vitamins and minerals increase the likelyhood of cancer:(