|     | 
    | 
Kenneth Jerniganís Prophetic Vision:
 
Address to National Federation of the Blind Convention Banquet
 
The accelerating growth of technology has brought opportunities to the blind but has also created barriers, says Ray Kurzweil. "At the end of this first decade of this new century, everyone will be on-line all the time with very high speed, wireless communication woven into their clothing. Within a couple of decades, we will have established new high bandwidth pathways of communication directly to and from our brains. Will this represent a great enabler for blind students and workers or a new set of obstructions?" Former National Federation of the Blind president Dr. Kenneth Jernigan's vision of "the worldís first world-class research and training institute for the blind" should help. 
 
 Published on KurzweilAI.net 
            July 9, 2002.
Twenty-seven years ago, I had the honor of meeting Dr. Jernigan, 
              and other leaders of the National Federation of the Blind. Back 
              then, Jim Gashel headed up the Washington office and displayed the 
              same passion and strategic brilliance then that he would demonstrate 
              in this crucial position for the next quarter century. Marc Maurer 
              was then a young student, but was already demonstrating his commitment 
              and leadership capacities as the NFB's student leader.  
I had the privilege of working intimately with the NFB's engineers 
              and scientists, under the leadership of Michael Hingson, to create 
              a print-to-speech reading machine. The lessons of that experience 
              have animated my career since that time, the most important of which 
              is the following. If you want to create a new technology, then the 
              people to turn to, the people who have the motivation and the knowledge 
              to do the job right, are the intended users themselves. 
I've remained involved with reading machine technology for the 
              last 27 years, most recently with Kurzweil Educational Systems, 
              and have remained close to the NFB, both of which have been deeply 
              rewarding experiences. The NFB succeeds for two reasons: the endless 
              reservoir of dedication of its members, and the genius of its leadership. 
Dr. Kenneth Jernigan was a leader in the tradition of Moses and 
              Martin Luther King. And like both of these men, he would be unable 
              to personally experience the promised land toward which he had so 
              skillfully led his people. In his last year of life, Dr. Jernigan 
              articulated a vision that he knew he would never get to see: the 
              world's first world-class research and training institute for the 
              blind. It was a prophetic vision, and in a moment I'll share with 
              you why I believe that to be the case. 
Unlike many other leaders, Dr. Jernigan knew he was a mortal man 
              and prepared for new leadership long before there was any reason 
              to believe there was any impending reason to do so. He nurtured 
              Marc Maurer's leadership skills, and as is evident at this convention, 
              was as successful in this endeavor as in everything else he did. 
              When Dr. Jernigan passed from the scene, the vision of the research 
              and training institute was just that: a vision, and a daunting challenge 
              that many doubted would ever come to fruition. It is a fitting testament 
              to Dr. Jernigan's lifetime of leadership, and a reflection of the 
              dedication of the NFB's membership and the continuation of inspired 
              leadership in the person of Dr. Maurer, that this institute now 
              rises like a sphinx in the outskirts of Baltimore.  
Let me share with you why I think Dr. Jernigan's vision came at 
              a propitious time. Technology has always been important, but we 
              are now standing on the precipice of an inflection point in human
history. Technology is reaching what I call the knee of the curve, 
              a point in time in which its inherently exponential growth is taking 
              off at a nearly vertical slope. I've studied technology trends for 
              several decades and developed mathematical models of its progression. 
              The most important insight that I've gained from this study is that 
              the pace of progress is itself accelerating. While people are quick 
              to agree with this assessment, few observers have truly internalized 
              the profound implications of this acceleration. It means that the 
              past is not a reliable guide to the future. We're doubling what 
              I call the paradigm shift rate every decade. So the twentieth century 
              was not 100 years of progress at today's rate of progress because 
              we've been accelerating up to this point. The last 100 years was 
              akin to 20 years of progress at today's rate of progress. And we'll 
              make another 20 years of progress at today's rate of progress, equal 
              to all of the twentieth century, in the next fourteen years. And 
              then we'll do it again in another seven years. Because of the power 
              of exponential growth, the twenty-first century will be like 20,000 
              years of progress at today's rate of progress, which is a thousand 
              times more change than what we witnessed in the twentieth century. 
The other insight I've had is that technology is a mixed blessing. 
              It brings both promise and peril. If we could magically go back 
              200 years ago and describe the dangers of today's world to the people 
              back then -- as just one example enough nuclear weapons to destroy 
              all mammalian life on Earth -- they would think it crazy to take 
              such risks. On the other hand, how many of us today would want to 
              go back to the world of two hundred years ago? Before you raise 
              your hands, consider this. If it wasn't for the progress of the 
              past two centuries, most of us here tonight wouldn't be here tonight. 
              Average life expectancy in the year 1800 was only 37 years. And 
              most people on Earth lived lives filled with poverty, hard labor, 
              disease, and disaster, not to mention the ignorance and prejudice 
              that was rampant with regard to the capabilities of the blind.  
So, we've come a long way through both promise and peril. And few 
              of us would want to go back. As Dr. Maurer has said many times, 
              we'll never go back, certainly not to the lack of opportunity that 
              was the rule for blind people a half century ago.  
We also see the promise and peril of technology in its impact on 
              the blind. The digitization of information has brought many opportunities 
              as blind people have led the world in rates of computer literacy. 
              Reading machines, screen readers, voice-based news services such 
              as the NFB's News Line, and Braille translators, printers, and note 
              takers have all provided greater opportunity. But the downside of 
              technology has also been evident. With the great profusion of electronic 
              displays, access for the blind is often an afterthought if it is 
              thought of at all. The moment text-based screen readers were perfected, 
              the graphic user interface was introduced. It then took at least 
              a decade for Windows-based screen readers to become workable, at 
              which time a new set of challenges emerged from a profusion of new 
              web-based protocols such as Flash and Java that are once again creating 
              barriers.  
This intertwined promise and peril is going to accelerate. At the 
              end of this first decade of this new century, everyone will be on-line 
              all the time with very high speed, wireless communication woven 
              into their clothing. Will this represent a great enabler for blind 
              students and workers? Or will it represent a new set of obstructions? 
              To assure the former, we'll need new technology breakthroughs, public 
              accessibility standards, and a panoply of programs for training 
              and availability. This is why Dr. Jernigan's initiative was prophetic. 
             
Scientists are beginning to perfect new ways of communicating directly 
              with the human body and brain. There are already four major conferences 
              devoted to a field called bioMEMS: biological micro-electronic mechanical 
              systems that are beginning to noninvasively place intelligent devices 
              inside the human blood stream and brain. Within a couple of decades, 
              we will have established new high bandwidth pathways of communication 
              directly to and from our brains. Will these radical new technologies 
              be a good thing for blind people? Well, I suspect that the National 
              Federation of the Blind will have something to say about how these 
              developments are deployed and to assuring that they bring promise 
              rather than peril for the blind.  
 It looks like we will have the NFB's National Research and Training 
              Institute for the Blind just in the nick of time. Despite his illness, 
              Dr. Jernigan realized he did not have a moment to lose in articulating 
              his vision. And this is why I believe that Dr. Jernigan's foresight 
              was a prophecy. 
Copyright (C) July 2002 by Ray Kurzweil. 
            
 |   | Join the discussion about this article on Mind·X! |     |