Origin > Visions of the Future > How will computation and communication change our everyday lives, again?
Permanent link to this article: http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0394.html

Printable Version
    How will computation and communication change our everyday lives, again?
by   Rodney Brooks

How will we all be in the world 20 years from now, when we all have direct wireless connections to the Internet of that time with information services as yet unimaginable? Rodney Brooks responds to Edge publisher/editor John Brockman's request to futurists to pose "hard-edge" questions that "render visible the deeper meanings of our lives, redefine who and what we are."


Originally published January 2002 at Edge. Published on KurzweilAI.net January 21, 2002. Read Ray Kurzweil's Edge question here.

The actual day to day things that we do have been changed drastically for many people in the world over the last twenty years by the arrival of personal computers. We spend hours each day in front of a screen, typing. This was not the norm twenty years ago (although a few of us did it even then), and no one had access to the vast stores of information that are available to us on our laps now. We no longer ask for reprints or go to the library, but instead download pdf versions of papers that interest us. We no longer need to go to reference works but instead retrieve them directly on our PCs. The number of people that we correspond with has increased dramatically -- granted, the medium has changed too. And chatting on the phone to people on the other side of the world is no longer expensive or an event -- it is just as common and cheap as calling someone a hundred miles away. Our interaction with media is changing too -- it is becoming more and more pull rather than push, even for TV and radio entertainment -- we choose when and where we want to receive it, and how we will store it.

Surprisingly, neither the book, nor the movie, nor the documentary are dead. There are more of them, in fact, although the method of delivery is slowly changing. We have increased our number of options rather than supplanted the old ones.

Moore's law and the increase of telecommunications infrastructure are both continuing. What new options should we expect, and how will they change the way we work? What will be the next "web", as unimagined by most educated people today as our current one was in 1988? And what will be the impact of the new methods of delivery we can expect to be developed in the next 20 years?

Already tens of thousands of people have cochlear implants with direct electronic to neural connections to restore their hearing. Multiple groups are working on retinal implants, either into the eyeball, or interfacing to V1 at the back of the head; again to replace lost capabilities such as those resulting from macular degeneration. A few quadraplegics have direct neural connections to computer interfaces so that they can control a mouse and even type. As progress is made with these silicon/neural interfaces, pushed along by clinical pressures to cure those who are impaired, we can expect more and more "plastic surgery" applications. A direct neural typing interface first perhaps, and later data going the other way directly from the network into our brains. There are considerable challenges to be met in understanding neural "coding" to do this, but the clinical imperative is pushing this work along.

How will we all be in the world then, 20 years from now say, when we all have direct wireless connections to the Internet of that time with information services as yet unimaginable? How will our grandchildren's interaction with information change the way they work and think, in the same way that instant messaging and vast numbers of web pages have changed the way our children in elementary and high school operate today?

Copyright © 2002 by Edge Foundation, Inc.



www.edge.org

 Join the discussion about this article on Mind·X!  
 

   [Post New Comment]
   
Mind·X Discussion About This Article:

What in the world...?
posted on 01/22/2002 7:34 PM by roBman@InfoBank.com.au

[Top]
[Mind·X]
[Reply to this post]

> How will we all be in the world
---------------------------------
[then, 20 years from now say, when we all have direct wireless connections to the Internet of that time with information services as yet unimaginable?]

For me, this is the key part of your question.

It was the evolution of "mind" that has allowed us to build our awareness of space/time that we call the "real world" today.

Likewise I think this evolution of pervasive computing with wireless systems embedded in the space around us and even within us is building a completely new type of augmented consciousness. A new consciousness that will enable us to create a completely new view of "reality". While this may sound obvious at first, I think it has much deeper implications.

I also think Lee Smolin's question on the edge about "time" is related to this topic. As Rodney Brooks describes in this question, computing is distorting our very perception of space and time. Where we once went to the library to gather information, we now simply download it. Where communicating with people on the other side of the world was a slow and linear process (if possible at all), we now have instantaneous and hypertextual discussions with people all over the world.

I think this growth of augmented consciousness based on pervasive computing will introduce a new background framework just like the development of our current consciousness introduced space/time and our current view or "reality".

But what will this new background be...and what lies beyond that...?


roBman

"time" is a convenience biological entities use to describe change.
posted on 01/23/2002 6:54 AM by craighubleyus@yahoo.com

[Top]
[Mind·X]
[Reply to this post]

Smolin is right, time is biological, a convenience biological entities use to describe change. Maybe no more.

Re: "time" is a convenience biological entities use to describe change.
posted on 03/15/2002 12:38 AM by qed@cern.fr

[Top]
[Mind·X]
[Reply to this post]

time is an n order derivative of the second law of thermodynamics

biological "time" versus chemical "time"
posted on 03/15/2002 1:21 AM by craighubleyus@yahoo.com

[Top]
[Mind·X]
[Reply to this post]

So, there is this seemingly-radically-autonomous physical and chemical process described by the second law of thermodynamics.

Which, to be codified at all, must be observed and measured and compared and reproduced across many phenomena by living biological beings with sophisticated cognition (we humans).

Whereupon, devices (like "clocks") can be created to measure one radically autonomous process with another radically autonomous process - without a lot of input from the cognitive being (ourselves).

Biological or cognitive or empathic "time" versus chemical or thermodynamic or entropic "time" is a pretty basic conflict. Like Terran vs. Cosmist.

"Why the future doesn't need us..." - Bill Joy.

Re: What in the world...?
posted on 05/21/2002 1:54 PM by Citizen Blue

[Top]
[Mind·X]
[Reply to this post]

I think that the relativity of ideas that are spread by the use of the Internet, allows for facts to be tossed around; from this resource facts, and new ideas may evolve, for a larger understanding of knowledge. Sifting through what is true, false, or both, might be a challenge. The ability to communicate with more people over diverse areas i.e. cultures, may rid us eventually of provincial thinking.